XBOW vs Penetration Testing as a Service
Penetration testing as a service (PTaaS) puts human testers on a platform so you can book them faster. XBOW is an autonomous offensive security platform: agents test within the scope you set, independent validators confirm each finding, and the same method runs every time.
01
What PTaaS Fixed, And What It Did Not
PTaaS fixed the resource scheduling problem, but it did not fix consistency. The tester on your platform this quarter is not the same tester from last quarter, and their knowledge depth changes with them. Scale still means more testers and more cost.
02
How They Compare
| Criteria | PENTEST AS A SERVICE | |
|---|---|---|
| Who does the work | Autonomous agents, coordinated, with independent validators | A bench of human testers, with tooling |
| Consistency | The same method on every run | Varies with the tester assigned |
| Scope | Set once. Everything in it, every run | Agreed per test, widened by change order |
| Evidence | A complete, reproducible trace for every finding | A findings list, sometimes with a reproduction |
| Scale | Add targets | Add testers, add cost |
| Time to result | The run you started | Days to weeks, plus the queue |
| Where findings go | Jira, Microsoft Sentinel, or your tools through the API | The vendor's portal |
| Documentation | Public console guide, integrations guide, and API reference | The vendor's portal guide |
| Identity and administration | SSO and SCIM on Enterprise | Varies by vendor |
| Where PTaaS still wins | Auditor-ready reporting that meets SOC 2 and ISO 27001 pentest requirements, with the trace behind every line | A human to argue severity with, and a name on the letter |
03
If You Want a Human in the Loop
You keep one. Your team reviews every finding XBOW surfaces, and the trace shows exactly how it was reached. If your compliance program needs a human signature, keep it, and put XBOW underneath so the signature is on something proven.
04
FAQ
Talk to us.
A 5 minute overview of XBOW.
