Stop Scheduling Security. Start Securing with XBOW Pentest On-Demand.

Software now ships in minutes. Security still books meetings. As a founder, I’ve lived that mismatch the hard way. At Semmle, our first “one last thing” from procurement was a pentest request right as a major deal was about to close. Cue calls, scoping, scheduling, and waiting, while the product kept changing underneath the test. That experience stayed with me. Offense is moving at machine speed; defense cannot remain calendar‑bound. The next 24 months will decide which teams scale security to keep up with the speed of development.

When Offense Moves First

Attackers don’t wait for scoping calls. They automate recon, weaponize known flaws, and iterate at scale - and with generative AI, they can now craft exploits like never before. Meanwhile, many teams still treat pentesting as a one‑off compliance event, useful, but slow. The risk concentrates where resources are tight: Verizon’s 2025 DBIR warns that SMBs are targeted nearly 4× more than large organizations, and ransomware is linked to 75% of system‑intrusion breaches. This is the wrong moment to be trapped in scheduling purgatory.

The Unprepared Process

• Lead time & duration: Mainstream providers plan two calendar weeks of testing, with 3–5 business days to finalize reports and 30–90 days typical for retesting. Add 48 hours–7 business days of pre‑testing setup and kickoff. That adds up to 35-102 days before you have a clean report!.
• Cost: Credible estimates put typical pentests in the $10k–$35k band, with projects starting around $5k and exceeding $100k for complex scopes. For many startups, that’s a quarterly burn trade‑off.
  
  

I’ve been on the wrong side of this timeline. As a founder, you’re trying to land a customer, hire an engineer, and ship a release, not orchestrate a weeks‑long service engagement whose output lands after your code has already changed. “Time kills deals” isn’t a cliché; it’s an operating constraint.

XBOW Pentest On-Demand

Pentesting should match how we build software: self‑serve, on-demand, self-explanatory. That’s why we built XBOW Pentest On‑Demand. You point us at a target (URL + credentials), press launch, and our autonomous agent does the rest, no scoping meeting required. You receive an expert‑level, compliance‑ready report within five business days, complete with a plain‑English summary, steps to reproduce, and steps to mitigate for every finding. Pricing starts at $6,000 so teams can test earlier and more often.

This isn’t theory. We validated the approach in the wild: last August, XBOW reached #1 on the HackerOne leaderboard, demonstrating that autonomous agents can compete at the top tier of real‑world bug hunting. On our site you’ll see the results of human‑level testing at machine speed, with thousands of validated vulnerabilities found. 

For founders and engineering managers, the shift is practical:

• From event to habit. Launch a test in minutes after a big push. Get a report in days, retest fixes immediately, and keep momentum.
• From exclusivity to access. Autonomous testing compresses lead time and cost so SMBs can operate with enterprise‑grade assurance, before a release, before a board meeting, before a deal crosses legal.
• From guesswork to evidence. Every finding is validated and reproducible, so developers can fix with confidence, no “scan noise,” just actionable work.
  
  

As a founder myself, I wanted the tool I could never find: something I could start today, that would finish this week, and that would tell my team exactly what to fix, without derailing the roadmap or the sale. That’s the bar we set for XBOW.

Closing Thoughts

Security can be continuous (timely), autonomous (scalable), and actionable (developer‑ready). If offense is operating at machine time, founders must defend at machine time, without meetings as a prerequisite.

Autonomous offense demands autonomous defense.

‍